How
can we better predict emergencies—before
they emerge? Who are the people who need
support —and what do they need? How
much aid is needed—and where? How
do we disperse aid in time—before
things get worse? Is it possible to prevent
a crisis in the future?
These
are just a few of the questions
that food security specialists
in Ethiopia ask themselves.
To answer these questions we
require in-depth knowledge
of the way people live.
Ethiopia is diverse. People within a single region live differently,
are vulnerable to different hazards and cope differently when faced
with external shocks. This is where the Household Economy Approach
steps in. It supports decision-makers in getting the right kind
of assistance to the people who need it—and in delivering
it to them in time.
WHAT
is the Household Economy Approach?
The Household Economy Approach describes the ways in which families
in a livelihood zone manage their household. A livelihood zone
is a group of households that obtain their food and cash income
by roughly the same combination of means: they grow the same crops,
they keep the same types of livestock, they depend on the same
markets. The Household Economy Approach provides the following
information.
Diverse
livelihoods. The
approach recognises different
livelihoods which depend on distinct
geography, climate, ecology and
market access, taking into account
that people live differently
in different parts of the country.
Different
wealth categories. The
approach distinguishes between
poor, middle class and better-off
families and provides the percentage
of people in each category.
Food,
cash income and expenditure. The
approach describes how ‘typical’ families
within different wealth categories
earn their food and cash income
and how they spend it.
Markets. All
families—poor, middle class
and better-off—depend to
some extent on the market. The
approach gives a picture of people’s
dependence on, and access to
markets for buying and selling
goods and services, including
labour.
Seasonal
changes. The
approach gives a seasonal picture
of household economies, showing
changes in food and cash income
and expenditure patterns throughout
the year, thereby describing
peaks and valleys in people’s
access to food.
Hazards. The
approach highlights the external
shocks typical for a livelihood
zone and their impact on people’s
income and expenditure.
Coping
mechanisms. Food
crop failure, a rise in staple
food prices, an outbreak of cattle
disease, reduced access to market—whatever
the shock, people will react.
The Household Economy Approach
describes the coping mechanisms
of people in different wealth
categories in response to a shock.
INFORMATION
for decision makers
The Household Economy Approach supplies information which is complementary
to the existing data, and supports the design of more effective
emergency responses and long-term development programming.
Early
warning at the woreda level. The
Household Economy Approach provides
a set of indicators tailored
to a particular livelihood zone,
which can help to predict emergencies
at an early stage.
Response
strategies. People
will react to a shock. How they
react depends on the nature of
their livelihood and their income
level. The Household Economy
Approach predicts how people
will cope in the case of an emergency,
and what the scale of their food
and cash deficits will be.
More
than food. Though
food security is an important
factor for development, the Household
Economy Approach creates a broader
picture: one of livelihood security.
This includes access to non-food
items and services like water,
sanitation, healthcare, veterinary
services, crop extension services
and education. Access to these
is vital for long-term development.
Long-term
development. Information
about the way people live and
their vulnerability to external
shocks is an important input
for sustainable development programming.
Identifying the shocks that people
in a community and knowing their
reaction helps to adjust development
programme design and policy formulation
to the needs, possibilities and
constraints of the people.
VALUE
added
The Household Economy Approach is supplementary to the food security
methods that are currently being used in Ethiopia. It is a tool
that supports relief operations because it gives an answer to the
major food security questions:
WHERE? The
approach shows which livelihood
zones are likely to be affected
by particular shocks.
WHO? The
wealth breakdown gives a more
detailed insight into the people
who need support in a specific
area.
HOW
MUCH? The methodology
calculates more accurately the
size of the food and expenditure
deficit that people are likely
to face.
HOW
MANY? A better
estimate of the number of people
in need of assistance can be
calculated.
WHAT? The
Household Economy Approach describes
the specific kind of support
people need to overcome a shock.
WHEN? The
indicators help to predict when
an emergency will occur in a
specific livelihood zone and
how long its impact will be felt.
HOW
LONG? The seasonal
picture makes it possible to
calculate more accurately how
long people will need assistance.
NINE
PORTRAITS of
different household economies
In this folder you will find nine case studies—portraits
of people from diverse wealth categories in nine different livelihood
zones. These nine are only a fraction of the 42 different livelihood
zones that exist in Ethiopia’s Southern Nations Nationalities
and Peoples’ Region, but they provide insight into the kind
of information that is supplied by the Household Economy Approach.
Although the case studies describe only one person in each particular
livelihood zone, it should be noted that the Household Economy
Approach is not an approach tailored to individuals. Rather, it
provides an aggregate picture of the household economies of different
wealth groups within a particular livelihood zone. Thus, each of
the ‘portraits’ included herein describes a person
typical of a wealth category within his or her particular livelihood
zone. In order to provide a more complete picture, people have
been chosen from different wealth categories—in some cases
the farmer is poor, in others he or she is from a better-off family.
The case studies describe not only their household economy, but
also their vulnerabilities and possible interventions suggested
by the information gathered through the Household Economy Approach.
|